Skip to content

Work or learning?

February 15, 2013

Which do you think you focus on more in your classroom: work or learning?

 

Guy Claxton refers, in ‘What’s the Point of School?‘, to a study in which researcher Caroline Lodge discovered that teachers who professed to be interested in learning, used the word work 98% of the time and learning only 2%.

How much of your class time is spent thinking and talking about the process of learning? Do you and your students talk, what Claxton calls, Learnish? Or is it all about getting the work done?

It’s been exciting to hear so much Learnish being spoken as I wandered around my school this week. We chose to start the new school year inquiring into learning in every grade level. (Read about it here). Hopefully there will be carry over effects on learning for the rest of the year.

Here’s a clip I made last year of kids talking about learning. Coming back to it now, one of the things I like most about it is the background noise. If people were trying to work, the noise would be disruptive.

Sounds like learning!

16 Comments leave one →
  1. February 15, 2013 7:30 pm

    Learning. Definitely! And when writing reports, I try to avoid using the word work!

  2. Verena Zimmer permalink
    February 15, 2013 8:45 pm

    Hello,

    Thanks for the reminder! Yes, it’s NOT about work, worksheets, homework etc. only. Since I met Ron Ritchart I try to focus on learning in class. And it’s amazing how students are able to talk and reflect on it. :)

  3. February 15, 2013 9:18 pm

    Hi,
    I can so relate to this post. I have made a conscious shift this year (because of our unit on learning and what I learned about learning in preparing for the unit) to use the word learning and not work when talking to my students and to my team. My thinking is if we want kids to take ownership of their learning then we need to plan opportunities for learning to happen and make the learning visible for our students- all the time.
    I am so glad we started with this unit – am very excited for the learning journey ahead.

  4. Ms Kris in Brazil permalink
    February 16, 2013 1:52 am

    Such a gret post, Edna!!

    Homework is sort of ritualized at my school. We have a specific day it is sent home and a specific day it needs to be returned. I do it because I am “supposed” to do it, but it is always a struggle for me. How can the “homework” kids take home be about ‘learning’ and not just be more ‘work’? Today students were shocked when their very first homework assignment of the year was to take home a leveled rader of their choice, read it at least 3 times, preferably with someone else, and be prepared to share during our community meeting on Tuesday. No paper. No worksheet. “Just read?” they asked. “Well, read, read again, think about what your reading, think about a good place to read and a good time to read. But, yes, just read.” It’s so far out of the norm for them. Sharing will not be retelling the story, but sharing how, when and with whom they read their book. Let’s see how it goes.

    • Verena Zimmer permalink
      February 16, 2013 2:22 am

      What a great idea! I always try to give homework which I would like to do as a student as well and which is kind of fun.

  5. February 24, 2013 3:20 am

    Hello, I’m a student from the University of South Alabama’s EDM 310 class (Dr. Strange). This was a great observatory post! Teachers don’t realize the negative connotations associated with the word “work”. “Work” is a word used congruence with “chores” and other alike words, but “learning” seems so positive and uplifting. Great post! Keep them coming!

    • MBC permalink
      May 14, 2013 12:32 am

      Hello, Alice. What about the work your teachers do? You probably think of work in very positive terms – hopefully, anyway – in that context. Maybe, we should also ask, What is the meaning of work? Why do we call them works of art, works of music? What about work in the context of doing good works in the world? I’m not a physicist or scientist but when talking about levers, isn’t work used to describe the transfer of energy from one mass to another? Could we redefine work to reflect how we transfer our energy into the world around us? Monique

      • MBC permalink
        May 14, 2013 12:36 am

        And we could also define work in terms of certain duties that are required of us in our particular roles throughout life.

  6. February 25, 2013 4:46 am

    Great post, Edna. I was not familiar with Guy Claxton or the researcher cited, Caroline Lodge. I am often guilty of using the “get to work”, etc phrases. I think of myself as loving to learn, but this reminded me once again that the words we use are important and may have connotations and reactions we do not anticipate.

  7. educationsupportuk permalink
    February 27, 2013 2:28 am

    Reblogged this on Educationsupportuk and commented:
    Great use of two pieces of video to get the point across. I often ask teachers to listen before they ask children to get on with their work, as their discussion may be relevant and appropriate.

  8. Andrea permalink
    March 7, 2013 4:59 am

    I agree. Ideally it is a bit of both. Learn. Work. Share. Learn.

  9. Chris permalink
    April 17, 2013 7:21 pm

    Interesting idea…totally agree that the focus must be on learning but not necessarily at the expense of work. Perhaps we need to re-frame (help the students to re-learn) the concept of ‘work’ for our students so that they can embrace the learning of work and the work of learning.

Trackbacks

  1. Thinking about Learning
  2. Work or learning? « What Ed Said | Resources for Teaching | Scoop.it
  3. Work or Learning? Which do you value the most? | Educationsupportuk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: